Went to see this at the weekend at the ICA (who I've decided win the prize for snottiest staff ever.)
It was a truly shocking cinematic experience. Not so much because of the - many, gory - atrocities the ex marines talked about in the kind of truth amnesty that was organised. The most shocking thing was the men themselves - strikingly beautiful in their youth and openness - and their own shock. Each of them had this mixture of lucidity and terrible blockage, both in their memory and in the understanding of what they'd experienced.
Also interesting were the different agendas of the attendees. Some clearly wanted a forum for open confession. Others were frustrated that that wasn't purposive or constructive enough. Others again wanted to put the whole thing within a framework of racism.
I'm reading an autobiography from the 50s at the moment, and the other thing that struck me here for the first time, properly, was the effect of changing attitudes towards the sexes in the 60s and 70s. Of course we all know what happened, officially, but things we (some of us) take forgranted now, like it being alright for men to cry. It must have been strange and terrible and liberating and confusing for all kinds of natural behaviour to be condoned, comparatively suddenly.
I understand the veterans came under attack from certain predictable quarters for their appearance (without fail magnificently hirsute), and for the way some of them chose to express themselves. But one section in particular, which on the whole isn't representative of the otherwise very restrained, clear testimonies, made me think we've become way too dictatorial again about how we express ourselves, on the whole. In the hallway, away from the official podium, a discussion about racism had the kind of slightly mad stream of consciousness from which really interesting things come.
I can't explain it better than that, but you should see it if you can (although I think the run at the ICA is over).
Recent Comments